<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dan oshinsky dot com &#187; lifestreaming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danoshinsky.com/tag/lifestreaming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danoshinsky.com</link>
	<description>A blog about journalism. And my mother.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 13:48:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Thought About Lifestreaming</title>
		<link>http://danoshinsky.com/2009/10/13/a-thought-about-lifestreaming/</link>
		<comments>http://danoshinsky.com/2009/10/13/a-thought-about-lifestreaming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Oshinsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifestreaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danoshinsky.com/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The chart above is from Steve Rubel&#8217;s blog, and I think it&#8217;s a monumentally important step in terms of defining the scope of all this new media. (1) I&#8217;ll let Mr. Rubel explain what the chart means in terms of his blog: How would you feel about a structure like this where I theme the (&#8230;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" title="Livestream" src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/steverubel/NB7KCKI4EAqydyTSZqUje9VzdV6HCF0D17DspOluZSpYhswkwUafrmgAFizD/Lifestream.png" alt="" width="556" height="522" /></p>
<p>The chart above is from Steve Rubel&#8217;s blog, and I think it&#8217;s a monumentally important step in terms of defining the scope of all this new media. <sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-466-1' id='fnref-466-1'><b>(1)</b></a></sup></p>
<p><a href="http://www.steverubel.com/lifestreaming-lessons-a-90-day-report" target="_blank">I&#8217;ll let Mr. Rubel explain</a> what the chart means in terms of his blog:</p>
<blockquote><p>How would you feel about a structure like this where I theme the content based on the day of the week? Monday we tackle models and/or mindmaps, Tuesday we talk trends, etc. I want to post more often and more creatively than just writing.</p></blockquote>
<p>This gets to a thought that I&#8217;ve been working through for some months now. My blog has become much more targeted: I write about journalism, with a few anecdotes from my life thrown in. But my Twitter feed is all over the place. It&#8217;s essentially a link dump; I see an interesting article, and I post it to Twitter. The thing is, the links have no common theme, except for the fact that I find them interesting. So basically, I&#8217;ve got <a id="aptureLink_299pgOeAYS" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Del.icio.us">a Del.icio.us page</a> that&#8217;s targeted to friends.</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m not the only one with such a problem. Take the Twitter feed for the San Antonio daily newspaper, <em>The Express-News</em>. Follow <a id="aptureLink_TXuu8xXZyQ" href="http://twitter.com/mysa">@mysa</a> on a day-to-day basis, and you&#8217;ll find that their tweets are very strange. One minute, they&#8217;re tweeting the daily pollen count. The next, they&#8217;ve got photos from a crime scene. And minutes later, they&#8217;ll have the lotto numbers, or the score of a high school football game, or maybe a column about tacos. Point is: I&#8217;ve followed them for months, and I have no idea why they tweet the way they do.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a problem. If I follow you on Twitter or subscribe to an RSS feed of your blog, or even if I read/watch/listen to your media outlet&#8217;s news on a regular basis, I want to know the answer to two questions:</p>
<ol>
<li>What do you write/talk about?</li>
<li>Why do you write/talk about it?</li>
</ol>
<p>I like Rubel&#8217;s idea of defining days of the week, especially for new media that tends to span a variety of topics. It could be an interesting way to keep readers engaged.</p>
<p>As for my Twitter feed, I&#8217;d like it to be a bit more focused. The only question is: when I see a link or a topic that&#8217;s outside my scope, what should I do with it then?
<div class='footnotes'>
<div class='footnotedivider'></div>
<ol>
<li id='fn-466-1'>Which would include technology like: Tweeting, Facebooking, Flickring, texting, livestreaming, liveblogging, livechatting or any other verb that didn&#8217;t exist at the start of this millenium. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-466-1'>&#8617;</a></span></li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danoshinsky.com/2009/10/13/a-thought-about-lifestreaming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

